Platform · Signals

What changed in the business, and what it did to the outlook.

Not an event feed and not a notification centre. Each signal says what happened, what it changed versus the previous forecast, how certain the figure is, and whether anyone needs to act. Routine activity stays out of the way.

Signals · since your last review, Thursday

2 material changes

Ranked by impact
14 routine changes under $10K folded into the outlook
How Signals are ordered

Impact, confidence, urgency

ChangeImpactConfidenceUrgency
Cloud consumption above forecast−$200K
Q4 campaign commitments above plan−$225K
Acme contract amended+$18K
Engineering hiring delayed+$75K
A large change with low confidence is raised as a question, not a number. A small change with high urgency can still reach the top.
Ranked, not streamed

Ordered by what matters, not by when it happened.

Sebastian scores every change on financial impact, confidence in the calculation and decision urgency. A $200K cost increase with metered evidence outranks a $300K one that rests on a guess. Thresholds are yours, by account and by amount.

  • Impact is measured against the previous forecast, not against plan alone
  • Confidence comes from the evidence: metered, signed, posted, or inferred
  • Urgency reflects whether a decision window is closing
Changes are not work

A signal tells you what happened. Work tells you what needs doing.

Most changes update the outlook and stop there. When a change crosses a policy threshold or needs a judgement, Sebastian creates the right piece of work, assigns it, and links it back to the signal so the two never drift apart.

  • The hiring delay updated the outlook and created nothing
  • The contract amendment created a revenue treatment review for Daniel
  • The cloud increase opened an investigation shared by finance and engineering
Signals · change
Acme contract amendedWhat happened, and what it did to the outlook+$18K
Work · review
Revenue treatment reviewDaniel Reyes · due 31 Oct · opens the schedule comparisonReview
Most changes create no work at all
The hiring delay updated the outlook and stopped there. Work is only created when a policy, a threshold or a judgement needs a person.
What changes

What stops happening

P / 1

Finding out at the close

A signed amendment, a usage spike or a slipped start date reaches finance the day it happens, with its financial effect already calculated.

P / 2

Reading every alert

Fourteen routine changes this week were folded into the outlook without raising anything. Four were worth your time.

P / 3

Trusting a number without knowing how firm it is

Every signal carries its confidence and the evidence behind it. Low confidence is shown as a question, not hidden in a total.

Before and after

Knowing what changed, before and after Sebastian

AspectStatus quoSebastian
How finance hears about a changeIn the monthly review, or by someone mentioning it in a meeting.The day it happens, ranked among the other changes by its financial effect.
What a change comes withA line in a system of record and a question for next month.What happened, the effect on the outlook, the confidence, the evidence, and the work it created if any.
NoiseAlerts from every connected tool, each with its own idea of important.Material changes raised, routine changes folded into the outlook and listed.
Follow-throughAn email thread that may or may not end in a decision.A piece of work with an owner, a due date and a link back to the signal.
Related

Where a signal leads

Sebastian

Stop waiting for the close to understand the business.

Give finance a clearer view of performance, a better understanding of what is changing, and more time to act.

Your existing tools stay. Your financial outlook moves forward.